ReviewJournal of molecular biology2025
To What Extent is Anfinsen's Thermodynamic Hypothesis Consistent With the Formation and Polymorphism of Amyloid Fibrils?
Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cryo-EM structure of TGFBIp fibrils driven by a corneal dystrophy-linked mutation enables design of peptide inhibitors of aggregation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Cofactor-Free Tau Filaments Are Dynamic and Undergo Structural Evolution Driven by Thermodynamic Control.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Conserved catalytic motifs encode enzyme-like supramolecular peptide assemblies.Research square · 2026Article
- Amyloid Peptide Nanofibrils Promote Efficient Neurotransmitter Oxidation and Serve as Scaffolds for Melanin Production.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For half a century, Anfinsen's Thermodynamic Hypothesis has been considered the central pillar of protein science. In Anfinsen's words, this hypothesis holds that "…the three-dimensional structure of a native protein in its normal physiological milieu…is the one in which the Gibbs free energy of the whole system is lowest; that is, that the native conformation is determined by the totality of interatomic interactions and hence by the amino acid sequence, in a given environment". Applying this hypothesis to amyloid fibril-forming proteins presents challenges, which we contemplate in four questions. First, what is the "native" structure of amyloid-forming proteins, many of which are intrinsically disordered or are proteolytic fragments of larger proteins? Second, what is the thermodynamic landscape for the conversion of native monomers to highly stable fibril assemblies? Third, how do we reconcile Anfinsen's hypothesis, that a protein's amino acid sequence determines its 3-dimensional structure, with amyloid fibrils, for which single protein sequences are capable of folding into multiple polymorphs? Fourth, what is the "physiological milieu" of amyloid fibrils? Is it increased local concentration, cofactor binding, post-translational modifications, or cellular programming of diseased tissues? We discuss answers supplied by ex vivo observations and in vitro experiments, and conclude that amyloid protein structure in vivo is determined by its sequence and its physiological milieu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.