ArticleEBioMedicine2025
HLA-A∗03:01 as predictive genetic biomarker for glatiramer acetate treatment response in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Risk in Multiple Sclerosis: Susceptibility, Modifiers and Unresolved Questions.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Big data in multiple sclerosis.Current opinion in neurology · 2026Review
- Assessing Peripheral Blood Biomarkers and Predictive Patterns in Multiple Sclerosis Using Cytokines and Immune Gene Expression Profiles in Ocrelizumab-Treated Patients: Tracking Tumor Necrosis Factor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
56 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlatiramer acetate (GA) is a well-tolerated treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) and comparable in its efficacy to high-dose interferon beta (IFN). As a lack of validated treatment response biomarkers for MS hampers progress in personalised treatment, the study goal was to search for biomarkers of a successful treatment response utilising the known observation of T-cell expansions after GA treatment.
methodsT-cell receptor beta chain (TRB) sequencing was performed in 3021 patients with MS: a discovery cohort of 1627 patients with MS, 204 of whom had previously been treated with GA, and then validated in 1394 patients with MS, 424 of whom had previously been treated with GA. Clinical data from 1987 patients with MS treated with GA or IFN and available HLA information from the NationMS, ACP, EPIC, BIONAT, and CombiRx trial cohorts were used for a subsequent analysis.
findingsCommon GA-associated TRB expansions were exclusively detected in HLA-A∗03:01 or in HLA-DRB1∗15:01 backgrounds, within CD8+ effector- or CD4+ central-memory T cells. Both sets of common sequences clonally expanded after GA treatment in a first validation cohort and predicted GA exposure in two further validation cohorts. To evaluate whether restriction of public TRBs to only two HLA alleles is also associated with GA's clinical efficacy, we analysed five cohorts of patients with MS for a potential benefit of the two HLAs concerning the GA response compared to IFN. We consistently found positive interactions with HLA-A∗03:01. This included a relative reduction in relapse risk compared to IFN in HLA-A∗03:01 carriers of 33% (CombiRx: GA + IFN arm: HR 0.67 [95% CI: 0.47-0.96], p = 0.0269) and 34% (CombiRx: GA arm: HR 0.66 [95% CI: 0.45-0.98], p = 0.0377), and in risk to first relapse of 63% (NationMS: HR 0.37 [95% CI: 0.16-0.88], p = 0.0246), but no positive association with DRB1∗15:01.
interpretationHLA-A∗03:01 carrying patients with MS specifically benefit from GA treatment and GA significantly outperforms IFN in these patients. Therefore, determining HLA-A∗03:01 status before choosing a platform treatment for MS, would allow for a personalised treatment decision between GA and IFN.
fundingGerman Research Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Valhalla Foundation, Westridge Foundation, Mayer Foundation, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.