Observational studySurgery2025
Miscommunication associated with flow disruptions in the robotic operating room.
Observational study in Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First United States experience of robotic-assisted minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair using the Dexter surgical system.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMiscommunication in the robotic operating room occurs up to 3 times per hour and is a significant contributor to patient harm. In robotic surgery, environmental distractors exacerbate miscommunication and flow disruptions, elevating the risk of patient harm.
methodsWe directly observed 75 robotic surgeries and assessed miscommunication associated with flow disruptions using a custom observational instrument. Observers collected data on speech communication interferences and their event evidence, contextual data, staff involvement in the event, communication flow, and flow disruption time. Data from each observed case was aggregated into case-level events and analyzed with a weighted Pearson correlation analysis.
resultsCorrelation coefficients for contextual and event-based weighted correlates demonstrate the strongest relationships between overlapping conversations and no responses during a miscommunication and the surgeon leaning out of the console and clarifications. Contextual and staff-based correlates showed strong relationships between the frequency of clarifications, multitasking, and the involvement of all staff. Finally, evidence of event- and staff-based correlates showed the strongest relationships between the frequency of loud machines and the medical student; the frequency of the surgeon leaning out of the console and the surgical resident, attending surgeon, and scrub tech. Multiple near misses associated with miscommunication were observed.
conclusionMiscommunications and flow disruptions increase case length and the risk of misunderstanding and patient harm. The surgeon often leans out of the console to clarify messages. The surgical resident, certified registered nurse anesthetist, and scrub tech often mediate messages. Loud machines are associated with higher rates of no response, and medical students often request clarifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.