Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40749430›Full record

ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2025

Gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fails to exhibit task-sensitive modulations of dynamic stability: A preliminary analysis.

Jamie M Kronenberg, Elanna K Arhos, Michael A Riley, Nikita Kuznetsov, Susanne M Morton, Karin Grävare Silbernagel, Laura C Schmitt

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamie M KronenbergSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Elanna K ArhosDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael A RileyDepartment of Rehabilitation Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Advanced Human Performance and Neuromechanics Laboratory, University of Cincinnati Digital Futures, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Nikita KuznetsovDepartment of Rehabilitation Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Susanne M MortonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA; Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Karin Grävare SilbernagelDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA; Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Laura C SchmittSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Sports Medicine Research Institute, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: laura.schmitt@osumc.edu.

Funding

Can we modify gait asymmetry after ACL reconstruction?F31AR078580 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI ARHOS, ELANNA · 2021 to 2022
$68k
Movement System Resiliency: Understanding Motor Responses to Mechanical Perturbation after ACLRF31AR084897 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KRONENBERG, JAMIE · 2024 to 2024
$44k
NIAMS NIH HHS F31 AR078580NIAMS NIH HHS F31 AR084897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction would demonstrate altered movement variability during walking on a split-belt treadmill, where the belts can move at the same speed or two different speeds, compared to uninjured control individuals.

methodsParticipants (14 with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (8 females; average age 21.3 years) and 14 matched controls) completed a split-belt treadmill paradigm of two conditions: baseline (3 min) and split (12 min; 2:1 belt speed ratio with test limb at 50 % of baseline speed). Time points of interest were the last minute of baseline (baseline period) and the first (initial response period) and last minute (sustained response period) of split. Recurrence quantification analysis of bilateral sagittal plane knee angle time series was completed to assess movement variability (Percent Determinism, Mean Line, Max Line) across all three periods of interest.

findingsThere was a statistically significant interaction of period and group on test limb Max Line (F(2,52) = 3.187, P = 0.049, partial ƞ

interpretationAltered movement variability observed during the split-belt treadmill paradigm suggests that individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may demonstrate a less responsive movement system compared to uninjured individuals.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionGaitAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesExercise TestFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleWalkingYoung AdultAnterior cruciate ligamentMovement variabilityNonlinear analysis

Identifiers

PMID40749430
PMCPMC13380287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.