ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2025
Math language matters: math-specific verbal skills, not analog representation of non-symbolic magnitudes, predict symbolic fraction abilities in primary school children.
Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rational numbers: A systematic review and ALE meta-analysis of the neuroimaging of fraction and decimal processing in the brain.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Pooled it
- Nonsymbolic ratio and fraction magnitude processing predict fraction knowledge in early grades.Developmental psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fractions knowledge is widely recognized as a key building block for developing mathematical competence. However, many children face difficulties learning fractions. Recognizing these challenges, researchers have sought potential leverage points to enhance children's fraction learning. In the present study, we investigated the relative contributions of verbal skills vs. non-verbal, non-symbolic number processing to 5th- to 7th- grade children's fractions skills. Specifically, we compared two math-specific verbal skills-transcoding and mathematics vocabulary-and two skills representing non-symbolic analog magnitudes-approximate number sense acuity and acuity for processing non-symbolic ratios. To assess children's symbolic fraction abilities, we used an experimental fraction arithmetic error detection task alongside a fraction magnitude comparison task, with fractions stimuli composed of two-digit components. Critically, mathematics vocabulary was the only predictor of interest that significantly predicted performance on both the error detection and comparison tasks. Our findings underscore the importance of math-specific verbal skills in supporting children's fraction abilities, perhaps implicating their role in fostering conceptual understanding, while indicating a limited role for analog representational skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.