SynthesisSchizophrenia research2025
The role of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in determining the aetiology of psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Synthesis in Schizophrenia research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychosis is a transdiagnostic condition which can manifest as part of many disorders including those of primary psychiatric origin, or secondary to a medical condition. This study aims to systematically review and quantify the diagnostic accuracy of electroencephalography (EEG) in identifying people with psychosis secondary to a medical condition.
methodsA comprehensive search strategy was implemented across multiple databases. Inclusion criteria specified observational human studies with a minimum of 20 participants experiencing psychosis who underwent EEG. The reference standard was the final clinical diagnosis. Two reviewers independently assessed article inclusion using predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted by two blinded reviewers. A bivariate meta-analysis was conducted to model the correlation between sensitivity and specificity.
findingsThe search strategy yielded 8688 results, of which 38 were eligible. The main diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis found that the sensitivity (i.e., the proportion of patients with secondary psychosis who had an abnormal EEG) was 0·71 (95 % CI 0·61-0·80) and the specificity (i.e., the proportion of patients with primary psychosis who had a normal EEG) was 0·67 (95 % CI 0·58-0·74). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0·67, corresponding to poor discrimination. The pattern for each of the specific EEG abnormalities was a low-moderate sensitivity and high specificity.
interpretationEEG demonstrates poor discrimination in identifying a secondary psychosis. Specific EEG abnormalities exhibit potential diagnostic value, encouraging more detailed reporting standards. While EEG alone does not definitively distinguish psychosis aetiology, its integration with clinical assessment may enhance diagnostic precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.