Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40749228›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical focus2025

The effect of tumor growth kinetics on survival and time toxicity after resection of recurrent glioblastoma.

Adeline L Fecker, Cooper Stateler, Molly Joyce, Sidharth Sengupta, Hanna E Minns, Joseph G Nugent, Jordan L Smith, Seunggu Jude Han, Matthew D Wood, Ahmed M Raslan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Time toxicity among patients with cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adeline L Fecker1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Cooper Stateler1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Molly Joyce1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Sidharth Sengupta1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Hanna E Minns1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Joseph G Nugent1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jordan L Smith1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Seunggu Jude Han2Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Matthew D Wood3Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and.
Ahmed M Raslan1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Ramon F Barajas4Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Stephen G Bowden1Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Leveraging Biologically Specific PET/MRI Monitoring and Therapeutic Modulation of the Hypoxic Glioblastoma Tumor Immune Microenvironment into Improved OutcomesR37CA288577 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Ramon Francisco Barajas · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
Defining the Hypoxic Immunosuppressive Microenvironment as a Biomarker of Therapy Efficacy in Glioblastoma Using Iron Oxide Enhanced FMISO PET/MRIK08CA237809 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BARAJAS, RAMON FRANCISCO · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237809NCI NIH HHS R37 CA288577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReoperation for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial but is commonly offered to maximize patient quality of life (QOL) and functional status. While there is mixed evidence that waiting for surgery in primary GBM does not affect survival, this has not been studied in the context of recurrent disease, which is more aggressive. The aim of this study was to assess how recurrent tumor kinetics (i.e., tumor growth relative to the time to resection) affect survival and QOL, as measured by time toxicity, after repeat resection in patients with recurrent GBM.

methodsA prospectively collected database was queried for patients with first-time recurrent IDH-wildtype GBM, with progression confirmed by the modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, from 2012 to 2022. Only patients who were recommended surgery as the first-line treatment for disease progression were included. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to automatically detect growth rate and time to repeat resection (TTRR) thresholds that affected repeat resection survival (RRS). Time toxicity was the percentage of days of medical contact for the TTRR and RRS.

resultsSeventy-three patients were included in the analysis. The median TTRR of the overall cohort was 27.2 days (range 1-90 days), with a mean TTRR time toxicity of 25.2% (SD 29.2%). The median RRS was 270 days (range 23-1495 days), with a mean RRS time toxicity of 19.3% (SD 17.7%). Patients with tumor growth of 0.08 cm3 per day or faster (faster-growth group) had significantly worse RRS (p = 0.004) and time toxicity (p = 0.016). Patients who underwent repeat resection ≥ 43 days (longer TTRR group) after confirmed progression had significantly worse survival (p = 0.015) and the time toxicity increased after surgery (11.6% to 25.1%, p = 0.014). While there was no significant survival difference between the faster tumor growth and longer TTRR group compared with the faster growth and shorter TTRR group (p = 0.20), the group with faster tumor growth but shorter TTRR had better survival (median 179 days vs 81 days).

conclusionsFaster-growing GBM recurrence was associated with worse survival and time toxicity. Patients with a shorter time to surgery had improved survival compared with those with longer wait times, and this effect partially attenuated the poor risk of fast tumor growth. Therefore, tumor kinetics in recurrent GBM appear to be an important consideration for patient prognosis and QOL after surgery.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurosurgical ProceduresAdultAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReoperationSurvival RateTime FactorsIDH-wildtypequality of liferecurrent glioblastomarepeat resectiontumor growth

Identifiers

PMID40749228
PMCPMC12945442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.