ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning combining external validation to explore the immunopathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcer and predict therapeutic drugs.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbial dysbiosis and wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers: a mini review with a note on the role of artificial intelligence.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication of diabetes, often leading to amputation due to poor wound healing and infection. The immune-related pathogenesis of DFU remains unclear, and therapeutic drugs are limited. This study aimed to explore the immune mechanisms of DFU and identify potential therapeutic drugs using machine learning and single-cell approaches. Through differential expression analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, we identified 287 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which were significantly enriched in IL-17 signaling and neutrophil chemotaxis pathways. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) further pinpointed disease-associated modules containing 1,693 regulatory genes. Machine learning algorithms prioritized seven core genes-CCL20, CXCL13, FGFR2, FGFR3, PI3, PLA2G2A, and S100A8-with validation in an external dataset GSE147890 and single-cell sequencing revealing their predominant expression in neutrophils and keratinocytes. Immune infiltration analysis demonstrated significant dysregulation in DFU patients, characterized by elevated proportions of memory B cells, M0 macrophages, activated mast cells, and neutrophils. Potential therapeutic compounds were identified using the Connectivity Map database and tested through molecular docking and dynamics simulations. The study pinpointed selegiline, L-BSO, flunisolide, PP-30, and fluocinolone as promising therapeutic agents, offering new insights into the pathogenesis of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and potential therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.