SynthesisPloS one2025
Abdominal organ injury in cardiac arrest: Systematic literature review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of guidelines for the management of foreign body airway obstruction from 2005 to 2025.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Injury Patterns in Resuscitated Non-Traumatic Cardiac Arrest Patients-A Comparative CT Analysis Between Automated Chest Compression Devices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CEUS for characterization of post-CPR subcapsular liver injury in a potential organ donor.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and ischaemia could lead to abdominal organ injury. However, the importance of abdominal injury in cardiac arrest remains uncertain. We aimed to systematically review indexed literature to describe incidence of abdominal injury after non-traumatic cardiac arrest and associations with outcome.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus up to 12th September 2024 for studies reporting differences in outcomes between patients with and without abdominal injury, and all studies reporting abdominal adverse events after cardiac arrest. Two independent reviewers screened articles for eligibility. One reviewer extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Injuries were defined as traumatic or ischaemic, either in the studies or otherwise by the reviewers. Results were summarized and presented in tables and Forest plots. We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and registered the study in PROSPERO.
resultsWe included 68 studies and 140 case reports. Most studies were single-centre. Quantitative synthesis of evidence was not feasible given high heterogeneity and risk of bias. Traumatic injuries affected mostly liver and spleen, with incidences from 0% to 15%, reaching 29% in one study of mechanical chest compressions. Life-threatening injuries were uncommon. The incidence of ischaemic injury was dependent on assessment method; 7% to 28% had liver injury, 0.7% to 2.5% was diagnosed with non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia, 82% to 100% had intestinal injury measured by biomarkers. Ischaemic injuries were associated with mortality.
conclusionIn this comprehensive review of abdominal injuries following cardiac arrest, CPR-related traumatic injuries were uncommon, but should be considered in patients with unexplained clinical deterioration. Ischaemic injury incidence ranged from 0.7% to 100%, and was consistently associated with mortality. Whether abdominal ischaemia independently contributes to poor outcomes remains unresolved and warrants further investigation. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022311508.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.