ArticlePloS one2025
Medical costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have comorbid diabetes mellitus.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate medical costs and resource use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).
methodsData were obtained from the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) claims database. The baseline period comprised 6 months before the index date (first prescription date post-RA diagnosis) while the 12-month duration post-index date was the follow-up period. Patients with RA and DM prescribed an antidiabetic drug in the baseline period constituted the DM group, while patients with RA without DM or an antidiabetic prescription in the baseline and follow-up periods belonged to the non-DM group. Patients were matched by sex, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), months from the first RA codes, and medications. The primary endpoint was total medical costs per patient in the follow-up period. The secondary endpoints were costs for drugs, treatments, and materials, their sub-categories, and proportions of patients using the sub-categories.
resultsOne hundred and sixty-one DM group patients and 2,974 non-DM group patients were eligible for inclusion, and 109 patients were matched from each group. The median values of age and CCI were 59 years and 2.0 in both groups. After excluding DM-specific costs, both total medical costs and drug costs were significantly higher in the DM group compared with the non-DM group (total medical costs: DM/ non-DM: 5,163 USD/ 3,782 USD, P < 0.05; drug costs: DM/ non-DM: 2,242 USD/ 1,066 USD, P < 0.05) because of a higher proportion of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) users in the DM group (DM/ non-DM: 14.7%/ 5.5%). Treatment costs and material costs did not differ between the two groups.
conclusionsMedical costs for RA were higher in the DM group than in the non-DM group because of a higher proportion of biological DMARD users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.