Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748986›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Hard input, soft management and student engagement: How institutional actions promote innovation ability and academic performance among top innovative talent.

Tianbao Zhang, Weihai Huang, Zhimin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianbao ZhangCollege of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9860-377X
Weihai HuangCollege of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhimin LiuCollege of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The training and cultivation of innovative talent, especially top-quality talent, cannot be explained fully by reference to a simple linear input‒output model. Research that can open the "black box" that characterizes this process has important theoretical and practical significance with respect to efforts to promote the development of high-quality education. By reference to a sample consisting of 1,500 graduating doctoral students who participated in a national stratified sampling survey in China, we develop a structural equation model with the goal of investigating the different roles played by the hard inputs and soft management employed by institutions in the task of cultivating top-quality innovative doctoral students as well as the specific paths associated with this influence. Our analysis reveals that promoting learning initiative among doctoral students and regulating their level of scientific research engagement are important ways in which various institutional inputs, especially soft management measures, can affect the intrinsic innovation ability of doctoral students, whereas efforts to encourage doctoral students to pursue top-quality academic achievements on the basis of their acquisition of relevant capabilities are related mainly to the hard inputs provided by institutions.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceEducation, GraduateStudentsAdultChinaFemaleHumansLearningMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40748986
PMCPMC12316290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.