ArticlePloS one2025
Hard input, soft management and student engagement: How institutional actions promote innovation ability and academic performance among top innovative talent.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The training and cultivation of innovative talent, especially top-quality talent, cannot be explained fully by reference to a simple linear input‒output model. Research that can open the "black box" that characterizes this process has important theoretical and practical significance with respect to efforts to promote the development of high-quality education. By reference to a sample consisting of 1,500 graduating doctoral students who participated in a national stratified sampling survey in China, we develop a structural equation model with the goal of investigating the different roles played by the hard inputs and soft management employed by institutions in the task of cultivating top-quality innovative doctoral students as well as the specific paths associated with this influence. Our analysis reveals that promoting learning initiative among doctoral students and regulating their level of scientific research engagement are important ways in which various institutional inputs, especially soft management measures, can affect the intrinsic innovation ability of doctoral students, whereas efforts to encourage doctoral students to pursue top-quality academic achievements on the basis of their acquisition of relevant capabilities are related mainly to the hard inputs provided by institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.