ArticlePloS one2025
Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify and describe how success is currently conceptualised in research capacity building in nurses, midwives and allied health professionals in the UK.
introductionHaving a research active healthcare workforce is associated with improved patient outcomes as well as staff retention. It is therefore seen as a key target for many healthcare organisations. Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals form the largest group of healthcare professionals but are traditionally less involved in research than medically trained staff. A variety of schemes have aimed to address this through so called "research capacity building" activities but an understanding of what constitutes success is needed to aid development of future interventions. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Participants - Any or all of Nurses, Midwives or Allied Health Professionals. Concept- Definition of success or description of aims of activities aimed at research capacity building. Context- Within in the UK.
methodsContent from peer reviewed journals will be searched for in: Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, AMED, BNI and EMCARE Web of Science Core Collection. Grey Literature will be searched for in Google and Overton as well as key websites of organisations that work in developing research capacity. Website searches will include National Institute for Health and Care Research, all charities that form the Association of Medical Research Charities as of search date and the websites for the recognised professional bodies for Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals. Screening of titles and abstracts then full text will be undertaken by one person with 20% cross checked by a second reviewer. Data extraction will use a bespoke data extraction tool and will be undertaken by one person, with 20% cross checked with a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis and qualitative content analysis will be used to synthesise the data. REGISTERED: OSF Registries: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QVCDX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.