ArticlePloS one2025
Detection of false position attacks in VANETs through bagging ensemble learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimized stacked ensemble approach for detecting position falsification in VANETs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) are critical to Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), enabling vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication to improve road safety and traffic flow. However, VANETs face significant security threats, particularly position falsification attacks, where malicious nodes disseminate false Basic Safety Messages (BSMs). This study proposes an ensemble learning framework to detect such attacks, leveraging Decision Tree (CART), Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) classifiers enhanced with bagging. Using the VeReMi dataset, our RSU-level detection system analyzes sequential BSMs to detect malicious behavior. Results demonstrate that KNN with bagging achieves perfect precision, recall, accuracy, and F1 score (100%) for Attack 1, while maintaining near-perfect performance for complex attacks like Attack 2 (99.87% accuracy) and Attack 16 (97.85% accuracy). Decision Tree with bagging also performs well for simpler attacks but experiences a slight decline for highly complex scenarios. Random Forest with bagging excels in simpler attacks but struggles with complex patterns. MLP with bagging shows strong results for simpler attacks but underperforms in complex scenarios. The proposed framework highlights the effectiveness of ensemble techniques, particularly KNN with bagging, in safeguarding VANET communication systems, offering a scalable, efficient, and robust solution for VANET security.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.