ArticlePloS one2025
Does microcredit for the poverty-alleviated population have an income-increasing effect? Also on the "Raising the Low" effect.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Promoting the continuous income increase of the poverty-alleviated population has become one of the key tasks to consolidate the achievements of poverty alleviation, promote rural revitalization and achieve common prosperity. Based on the survey data of 738 farmers in six poverty-alleviated counties (cities) in an underdeveloped region in northwest China, this paper uses the endogenous transformation regression model to empirically explore the income-increasing effect of microcredit for the poverty-alleviated population, and uses the quantile regression model and OLS regression model to explore raising the low effect of microcredit for the poverty-alleviated population. The results show that: (1) Based on the counterfactual hypothesis, if the farmers who obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population are not loaned, their production and operating income will decrease by 3.31%, that is, microcredit has a significant income-increasing effect, and the income-increasing effect of obtaining microcredit for the poverty-alleviated population on the monitoring objects is greater than the households that have lifted out of poverty. (2) The mechanism of action shows that the microcredit policy for the poverty- alleviated population promotes income increase by promoting farmers to increase material capital investment and social capital investment. (3) The income-increasing effect of obtain microcredit for poverty-alleviated population on the low-income initial endowment farmers is greater than that on high-income initial endowment farmers, and farmers with low-land initial endowment have a higher income increase effect, that is, a 'raising the low ' effect. The overall efficiency effect on 'low→high 'initial endowment farmers shows a decreasing trend. Therefore, in order to ensure the effectiveness of financial precision assistance, we should promote the microcredit policy of the poverty-alleviated population from the aspects of policy stability and implementation precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.