Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Navigating life when a loved one's (euthanasia) death is near: A narrative interview study from the Netherlands.

Bernadette Roest, Megan Milota, Carlo Leget

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernadette RoestUniversity of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Megan MilotaJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carlo LegetUniversity of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-8141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we describe our empirical research that started out as an exploration of "family involvement" in the Dutch practice of euthanasia, in the broader context of end-of-life decision-making and care under guidance of GPs in the home-setting. Informed by care-ethical insights and narrative approaches to qualitative research, we performed an in-depth interview study with 18 close relatives of people with incurable metastasized cancer (9 prospective, 9 retrospective). We came to understand how relatives' involvement-not only in euthanasia but in any mode of dying-cannot be separated from relatives' efforts to navigate through many dimensions of life when the death of loved one is near. Relatives have to navigate different spaces, decision-dynamics and the unfolding of professional care, strong emotional experiences, and intimate relationships ("the I-you-we"). This study brought to the fore that relatives and patients first and foremost accompany each other on this journey. The role of the GP can be valuable but vulnerable, and relatives' broader social network and other professionals can be of enormous importance. The results of this study invited us to shift our perspective: it is not family members who get involved in euthanasia as a primarily medical affair. Instead, medical professionals are taking part in the profoundly social-relational experience of death and dying within families, whether that entails euthanasia or not. With this shift of perspective, specific practical and ethical questions start to receive more attention, for example questions about the available support for both patients and relatives regardless of the mode of dying.

Indexed as

EuthanasiaFamilyAdultAgedDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNarrationNetherlandsQualitative ResearchRetrospective StudiesTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID40748865
PMCPMC12316235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.