Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748635›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Formulary Restrictions and Relapse Episodes in Persons With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Barbara Blaylock, Karen Van Nuys, Geoffrey Joyce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barbara BlaylockBlaylock Health Economics LLC, Reno, Nevada.
Karen Van NuysLeonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Geoffrey JoyceLeonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Narrow formularies can be used to increase rebates and manage the use of costly drug therapies in the US. Objective: To examine the association between the breadth of formulary coverage for multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and MS relapse. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 100% Medicare administrative data from 2018 to 2022. The data analysis was conducted from August 1, 2024, to January 30, 2025. Beneficiaries with stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs) and Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans (MA-PDs) were followed for at least 5 quarters (baseline, quarters 1-4; follow-up, quarter 5). Calendar periods reflected formulary decision-making. Beneficiaries in the same Medicare Part D plan during baseline and follow-up, with relapsing-remitting MS, and with MS DMT use during baseline were included. Exposures: Formulary breadth was low coverage if the 4-quarter moving average of MS DMT drug or class coverage was below the median by plan type and quarter; it was considered high coverage if the average was above the median. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was MS relapse, including inpatient or outpatient treatment for MS. Multivariable logistic regressions were estimated separately for PDPs and MA-PDs, controlling for patient and plan characteristics and clustering for repeated observations by beneficiary. Results: The claims analysis included 50 162 unique beneficiaries in PDPs (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [12.1] years; 74.9% female) and 34 708 in MA-PDs (mean [SD] age, 58.2 [10.3] years; 77.2% female). Oral or injectable MS DMTs were frequently excluded from coverage (>50% excluded in 2022: PDPs, 11 of 15 DMTs; MA-PD, 9 of 15 DMTs). The MS relapse rate was greater for low- vs high-coverage PDPs (10.6% vs 9.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.92]) and MA-PDs (7.8% vs 6.9; OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.91]). In multivariable analyses, broader formulary coverage during baseline was associated with less MS relapse during follow-up (PDP: adjusted OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.96] for drugs and 0.94 [95% CI, 0.91-0.97] for classes; MA-PD: adjusted OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.94] for drugs and 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98] for classes). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare data, broader formulary coverage was associated with an 8% to 12% lower odds of MS relapse in MA-PDs and a 6% to 9% lower odds in PDPs. Formulary coverage and restrictions should be tailored for patient need, not just management of costs and use.

Indexed as

Formularies as TopicMedicare Part DMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40748635
PMCPMC12317357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.