Trial reportEuropean heart journal2025
Heparin administration at first medical contact vs immediately before primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the HELP-PCI trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the miR‑26a‑5p/MSMO1/7‑DHC Axis: A Novel Therapeutic Target in Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Coronary Reperfusion in STEMI After Pre-Hospital Loading Dose of Triple Antithrombotic Therapy.Clinical cardiology · 2026Observational
- Temporal improvements in prehospital systems-of-care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in Victoria, Australia: a retrospective study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Prehospital Administration of Aspirin and Unfractionated Heparin on In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of the FDAPR Index for Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Machine Learning Study Based on a Multilayer Perceptron.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe beneficial effect of pre-treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) at first medical contact (FMC) before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in all-comers with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain.
methodsHELP-PCI was an investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial conducted at 36 clinical centres in China. Patients with STEMI presenting ≤12 h after symptom onset undergoing PPCI were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous administration with UFH (100 U/kg) at FMC or in the Cath Lab through a catheter sheath. The primary endpoint was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade (TFG)-3 of infarct-related artery (IRA) at diagnostic angiography before PPCI. The secondary outcome was complete epicardial and myocardial reperfusion after PPCI and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; defined as the composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, heart failure hospitalizations, re-infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned revascularization, and stroke) at 12 months. Safety outcome was 30-day Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥2 bleeding.
resultsA total of 999 patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI were randomly assigned to receive either UFH administration at FMC (n = 505) or in the Cath Lab (n = 494). Pre-treated population at FMC showed a higher frequency of TFG-3 of IRA compared with the Cath Lab group (23.6% vs 17.6%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.97; P = .02). There were no significant differences in secondary endpoints or in the safety endpoint, including 12-month MACCE, complete epicardial and myocardial reperfusion, and major bleeding.
conclusionsPre-treatment with loading-dose UFH at FMC was associated with an improvement of spontaneous reperfusion of IRA without increasing the risk of major bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.