ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025
Open Air Quality Data Platforms for Environmental Health Research and Action.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining Data-Driven Approaches for Clean Air Advocacy in a Changing Climate: a Scoping Review.Current environmental health reports · 2026Article
- A Multi-Source Sensor Dataset for Spain: Integrating Air Quality, Meteorological, Mobility and Calendar Records.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding the Article "Open Air Quality Data Platforms for Environmental Health Research and Action".Current environmental health reports · 2025Article
- Air Sensor Network Analysis Tool: R-Shiny Application.Atmosphere · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAir pollution remains the greatest environmental threat to public health, and significantly impacts many aspects of human life. This review surveys digital platforms that provide data openly and make air quality data available for use and analysis by environmental health researchers for scientific research and to inform air quality action. RECENT
findingsSuccessful programs that rely on different types of open air quality data have been observed and exist as models for regions that have yet to improve their air quality. However, disparities remain in the availability and granularity of generated air quality data in resource-rich and resource-poor regions. Even if air quality data are made available and open, their usability and actionability still remain challenging. Determinants of usability may include the user’s technical know-how and ability to deal with disparate data; compute capabilities; barriers in data sharing and data generation; and misuse and misclassification of data and levels and sources of exposure. However, the synthesis of different sources of data and advancements in modeling may help fill in spatiotemporal gaps in many areas of the world. In addition, the democratization of air quality data is facilitated by advancements in air quality data generation (e.g., data collection by open-source air sensors) and the ability to contribute to global, open-access, publicly available repositories that openly share data. Many open data platforms exist for sharing and accessing ground-based/in-situ data, satellite remote sensing data, and modeled or otherwise derived outputs. Online platforms that allow visualization and analysis without the need to download software are also now widely available. Despite wide availability, disparities in accessibility exist—expansion and support through interdisciplinary collaboration and continuous funding support for air quality data is essential for the continuous global benefit and community-specific action to address air quality as an environmental health issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.