Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748455›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Medical follow-up after solid organs transplantation].

Christian Hinze, Dominik Berliner, Adelheid Görler, Richard Taubert, Jens Gottlieb

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian HinzeKlinik für Nieren- und Hochdruckerkrankungen, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. Hinze.Christian@mh-hannover.de.
Dominik BerlinerKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Adelheid GörlerKlinik für Herz‑, Thorax‑, Transplantations- und Gefäßchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Richard TaubertKlinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Jens GottliebKlinik für Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical follow-up after the transplantation of solid organs is a key component in ensuring long-term survival of both the graft and the patient. This article outlines the essential principles of post-transplant care for recipients of heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplants. Across all organ types, certain core elements are universally important: monitoring of graft function, individualized adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy, early detection and treatment of rejection episodes, consistent prevention, recognition, and management of infections, professional care for comorbidities, and appropriate cancer screening. Despite these shared principles, there are significant differences between the various organ transplants in terms of potential complications, immunological risks, and monitoring strategies. Successful long-term outcomes depend heavily on close collaboration between transplant centers, specialists in private practice, and general practitioners.

Indexed as

AftercareOrgan TransplantationPostoperative ComplicationsGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsAftercareComorbidityImmunosuppressionInfectionsOrgan transplantation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.