ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2025
Development and Piloting of a Scalable Training for Peer Recovery Specialists in an Evidence-Based Substance Use Intervention: Preliminary Implementation Outcomes.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals from minoritized and under-resourced communities have significantly less access to specialized services from substance use disorder. Peer recovery specialists (PRSs) show promise for increasing access to services, especially in low-resource settings, but have not historically been trained to deliver evidence-based interventions (EBIs). While behavioral activation (BA) has shown promise as a PRS-delivered EBI, few studies have examined broader training efforts that may inform the scale-up of this model. This study describes the co-development (including PRSs and community-based treatment providers) and dissemination of a BA training for PRSs. The initial training was piloted with five PRSs, who provided qualitative feedback on training content and delivery. The revised training was then delivered to 168 PRSs. Post-training, participants completed implementation outcome measures assessing feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness. A follow-up survey was sent within six months to assess continued use and perceptions of BA. Qualitative feedback identified BA as feasible for PRS delivery and appropriate for the PRS role, and identified ongoing supervision and experiential learning as key needs for PRS training. PRSs who received the revised training found it to be feasible, appropriate and acceptable. Follow-up surveys suggest PRSs continued to use BA skills and found it was a good fit to their role and feasible for their work situation. PRS-delivery of EBIs has the potential to increase access to treatment for individuals from low-resource communities. With appropriate modifications for the unique needs of this workforce, PRSs can be trained on a large-scale to deliver BA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.