Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748415›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025

Agatston scoring for assessment of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Karim Mostafa, Jakob Christoph Voran, Markus Müller, Anka Pohlmeyer, Marie Noormalal, Mostafa Salem, Mohammed Saad, Patrick Langguth, Derk Frank, Carmen Wolf and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Evaluation of coronary artery calcium score by age and sex: a multicenter study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karim Mostafa *Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany. karim.mostafa@uksh.de.
Jakob Christoph Voran *Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and critical care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Markus MüllerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and critical care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Anka PohlmeyerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and critical care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Marie NoormalalDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and critical care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Mostafa SalemDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and critical care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Mohammed SaadDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and critical care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Patrick LangguthDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Derk FrankDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and critical care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Carmen WolfDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Hatim SeoudyDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and critical care, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) angiography remains a cornerstone of pre-interventional assessment for transaortic valve implantation (TAVI). CT imaging prior to TAVI further allows for evaluation of the coronary arteries, with the simplest method being the calculation of the coronary Agatston score. Following the expansion of TAVI to lower risk patients, non-invasive coronary diagnostics in the framework of TAVI gain importance as they may allow patients to avoid unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA) before the procedure. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of coronary Agatston score values on pre-TAVI CT scans for the assessment of coronary artery disease. A total of 285 patients received a standard TAVI evaluation CT scan and routine ICA prior to the TAVI procedure. Agatston score values of the coronary tree and the proximal coronary segments (1, 5, 6, 11) were calculated separately by two radiologists. Reference for the AUC analysis was performance of PCI or stenting of the corresponding coronary segment following the recommendation of the Heart Team. ROC-analysis was performed for evaluation of the Agatston score at the level of the heart, the coronary arteries and the proximal coronary vessel segments (1, 5, 6 and 11) level to determine cutoff-values for optimal sensitivity and specificity. A total of 285 patients received a standard TAVI evaluation CT scan and routine ICA prior to the TAVI procedure. Agatston score values of the coronary tree and the proximal coronary segments (1, 5, 6, 11) were calculated separately by two radiologists. Reference for the AUC analysis was performance of PCI or stenting of the corresponding coronary segment following the recommendation of the Heart Team. ROC-analysis was performed for evaluation of the Agatston score at the level of the heart, the coronary arteries and the proximal coronary vessel segments (1, 5, 6 and 11) level to determine cutoff-values for optimal sensitivity and specificity. Coronary artery disease requiring intervention was present in 61 patients upon ICA (17.9%). In predicting the need of performance of a coronary intervention at a sensitivity of >89%, Agatston values of the full coronary tree >170 allow for a sensitivity of 90% (AUC 0.76, NPV 0.93). The sum Agatston score of the proximal segments >117 enables a sensitivity of 90% (AUC 0.74, NPV 0.93) and >47 a sensitivity of 98% (NPV 0.98). On the segmental level, Agatston values of >22 in the proximal RCA and >30 in the proximal LAD and CX allow for a sensitivity of 90% (AUC RCA 0.74, NPV 0.98; LAD 0.71, NPV 0.94; CX 0.75, NPV 0.99). Aiming for 98% sensitivity or higher, Agatston values of >2 for the RCA, >3 for the LAD and >27 for the CX apply (RCA NPV 1; LAD NPV 0.97; CX NPV 1). Coronary artery Agatston scoring on TAVI evaluation CT scans can serve as a predictor for the need of coronary interventions in the workup leading up to TAVI and it provides valuable information for identification of patients without significant coronary artery disease and may aid in allowing for the avoidance of invasive coronary artery diagnostics.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCardiac CatheterizationComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsMultidetector Computed TomographyTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleObserver Variation

Identifiers

PMID40748415
PMCPMC12405386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.