Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748396›Full record

ReviewBiogerontology2025

Selective resilience in brain aging: challenging the scope of the disposable soma theory.

Bruno César Feltes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biogerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bruno César FeltesInstitute of Biosciences, Department of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. bruno.feltes@ufrgs.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 24/2551-0001277-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The disposable soma theory (DST) posits that organisms prioritize reproductive success over long-term somatic maintenance, resulting in an inevitable decline after reproduction. However, such a basis does not fully explain the human brain's capacity to preserve metabolically costly, plastic, and cognitively essential functions well beyond the reproductive peak. This Perspective challenges the universality of DST by proposing that brain aging follows a selectively resilient trajectory, shaped by post-reproductive adaptive pressures. Rather than depicting brain aging as passive deterioration, this work reinterprets it as an active and dynamic reallocation of energy and resources under systemic decline. Molecular and biochemical adaptations, such as ketone body metabolism, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺) salvage, alternative antioxidant defenses, and persistent estrogenic sensitivity, are presented as integrated strategies that ensure the selective preservation of neuronal functions. This article offers a revised theoretical lens that emphasizes adaptation, regional prioritization, and energetic economy across the lifespan, challenging some postulates of the DST.

Indexed as

AgingBrainAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsEnergy MetabolismHumansAgingBrainCaloric restrictionDisposable somaGut-Brain axisNAD+PARP1Pyruvate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.