Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748184›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2025

'Are they just putting up with me'? How diversity approaches impact LGBTQ+ employees' sense of being tolerated at work.

Kshitij Mor, Seval Gündemir, Jojanneke van der Toorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kshitij MorOrganizational Behavior Group, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7510-511X
Seval GündemirRotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jojanneke van der ToornOrganizational Behavior Group, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap 024.003.025Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research investigates whether and how workplace diversity approaches-identity-conscious versus identity-blind-are associated with LGBTQ+ employees' perceptions of tolerance. Whilst tolerance is widely regarded as an important virtue for the harmonious functioning of diverse societies, it can inadvertently harm minoritized individuals. In workplace settings, perceptions of tolerance may hinder the benefits of diversity by discouraging minoritized employees from sharing their perspectives and prompting individuals with relatively concealable stigmas, such as LGBTQ+ employees, to conceal their identities. Across two studies (n = 907), we examine the conditions under which tolerance perceptions may arise. Study 1 explores LGBTQ+ prospective employees' anticipated tolerance in organizations with identity-blind versus identity-conscious mission statements. Study 2 examines LGBTQ+ employees' workplace experiences, focussing on how organizational and leadership diversity approaches are related to perceptions of tolerance. Findings reveal that relatively identity-blind approaches are associated with increased feelings of being tolerated. Moreover, identity-conscious leadership strategies, when coupled with identity-conscious organizational approaches, further diminish perceptions of being merely tolerated. Our findings underscore an un-intended correlate of identity-blind diversity approaches, which may perpetuate tolerance-focussed climates and indirectly undermine inclusion for LGBTQ+ employees.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityEmploymentOrganizational CultureSexual and Gender MinoritiesSocial IdentificationWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultdiversity approachleadershipLGBTQ+tolerance

Identifiers

PMID40748184
PMCPMC12315620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.