Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748053›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2025

Research Priorities for Noninvasive Sampling of the Lower Respiratory Tract during Acute Respiratory Failure: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

William Bain, Aartik Sarma, Luisa Morales-Nebreda, Alicia N Rizzo, Malcolm Herron, Shelton W Wright, Robert S Hagan, Christine L Vigeland, Erin Mwizerwa, Chiagozie Pickens and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract Compartmentalization in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Think Locally, Act Globally: Resolving the Peripheral Immune Milieu in Bacterial Pneumonia.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Luisa Morales-NebredaORCID 0000-0002-7126-0518
Christine L VigelandORCID 0000-0003-4468-374X
Erin Mwizerwa
Chiagozie PickensORCID 0000-0002-3400-9228
Susan Toth
Bin Cao
Eileen Rubin
Marcos I RestrepoORCID 0000-0001-9107-3405
Hrishikesh S KulkarniORCID 0000-0003-4830-5084
Carolyn S Calfee
Richard G WunderinkORCID 0000-0002-8527-4195
Charles S Dela CruzORCID 0000-0002-5258-1797
Georgios D KitsiosORCID 0000-0002-1018-948X
Julie A BastaracheORCID 0000-0003-0458-6507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research using lower respiratory tract (LRT) sampling may lead to improved understanding and management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Research bronchoscopy is a valuable tool for sampling the LRT during ARF. However, bronchoscopy may be limited by challenges with repeated sampling, the inability to sample the most severely ill patients, and increased resource utilization. "Noninvasive" sampling strategies, such as nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, endotracheal aspirate collection, and heat moisture exchange filter fluid collection, may expand the opportunity to collect LRT samples for research. Upper respiratory tract and sputum sampling may enable sampling in nonintubated patients with ARF, for whom there is no direct noninvasive access to the LRT. We convened a workshop with 32 experts from diverse continents, scientific backgrounds, and healthcare professions, all with experience in clinical or research practice during ARF. The Workshop goals were to review existing noninvasive sampling methods, evaluate their respective potential benefits and limitations, and identify future research priorities aimed at improving standardization and integration of these approaches into practice. Findings were generated by review of literature, expert presentations, meeting discussions, and electronic surveys using a modified Delphi approach. Participants agreed that each sampling method provides biologically meaningful data during ARF while also acknowledging that each method has benefits and limitations. Various potential advantages to noninvasive methods include reduced cost, enhanced speed, and ease of adoption compared with standard fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Despite the potential advantages, rigorous head-to-head comparisons between noninvasive methods and/or standard bronchoscopy are limited, which is a priority for future research. Additional research priorities include examination of the feasibility and benefit of serial sampling of the LRT and investigation of how LRT biomarkers are related to lung pathophysiology and patient-centered clinical outcomes during ARF. This Workshop Report provides guidance for investigators to integrate LRT sampling into their research and highlights key priorities, such as rigorous head-to-head comparison of sampling methods for research, to improve the standardization of noninvasive sampling methods and use of LRT sampling in research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Respiratory InsufficiencySpecimen HandlingAcute DiseaseBiomedical ResearchBronchoalveolar LavageBronchoscopyHumansSocieties, MedicalSputumUnited Statesacute respiratory distress syndromeacute respiratory failurelower respiratory tractmechanical ventilationpneumonia

Identifiers

PMID40748053
PMCPMC12329329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.