ArticlePharmaceutical biology2025
Unveiling the cytotoxicity of Red Sea
Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextBreast and liver cancers remain significant global health challenges, necessitating the discovery of novel anticancer agents. Marine cyanobacteria, such as
objectiveThis study aims to identify and characterize bioactive compounds from MATERIALS AND
methods
resultsLC-QTOF-MS/MS analysis identified 25 metabolites, including apocarotenoids, spirovetivane alkaloids, and toxins. Network pharmacology analysis suggested that malyngamide D, isomalyngamide I, mueggelone, 11,12-didehydrospironostoic acid, and 12-hydroxy-2-oxo-11-epi-hinesol were potential bioactive compounds targeting proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase (Src), mitogen-activated protein kinase 3(MAPK3), and MAPK1 kinases. Molecular docking studies further supported these findings, with 11,12-didehydrospironostoic acid exhibiting strong binding affinities to Src and MAPK1 kinases. Among the nine fractions obtained, Fraction 1 showed the most potent anticancer activity against both MCF-7 and HepG2 cell lines, with IC DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThe results of this study highlight the potential of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.