ArticleJournal of addiction medicine
Severe Fentanyl Withdrawal Associated With Medetomidine Adulteration: A Multicenter Study From Philadelphia, PA.
Article in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responding to medetomidine in Philadelphia: narrative summary of the public health response to a new psychoactive substance.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2026Article
- Medetomidine in the unregulated drug supply.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Perspectives on prescribed safer supply programs among people who inject drugs in Baltimore, Maryland: A mixed methods study among individuals highly affected by drug toxicity.The International journal on drug policy · 2025Article
- Recent advances in the identification and quantification of xylazine and medetomidine in biological specimens.Bioanalysis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMedetomidine, a potent veterinary α2-adrenergic agonist, has emerged as an adulterant in the illicit fentanyl supply in Philadelphia, PA. Accompanying this change, a severe withdrawal syndrome, distinct from opioid and more comparable to dexmedetomidine withdrawal, emerged. We describe it.
methodsA multicenter case series is described across 3 hospital systems in Philadelphia between September 2024 and April 2025. The cohort included patients who reported opioids as the primary drug of choice, who presented with opioid withdrawal complicated by severe sympathetic activation and required hospitalization. Data extraction from the electronic health record included demographics, clinical outcomes, and confirmatory toxicology in a subset.
resultsTwo hundred nine patients met the inclusion criteria; the median age was 38 years and 29% were female. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission occurred in 77.5%, with 20.1% requiring intubation. Symptoms were often refractory to traditional opioid withdrawal management, and 73.7% received dexmedetomidine infusion. In the cohort subset with toxicology testing (n=43), 100% had fentanyl and medetomidine metabolites, while xylazine metabolites were not always present (24, 55.8%). Severe complications included encephalopathy (35.4%), myocardial injury (28.7%), and rarely seizures (5%). Patients suffered from severe withdrawal, with a median maximum recorded Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Score (COWS) score of 23.
conclusionsThis study describes individuals experiencing severe withdrawal, temporally associated with medetomidine-adulterated fentanyl exposure. Clinicians should be alert to the limitations of standard withdrawal protocols for fentanyl or opioids and the need for aggressive α2-agonist therapies, such as dexmedetomidine. As medetomidine continues to spread in the illicit drug supply, adapting clinical and public health responses will be critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.