Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747918›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2025

Sensitivity vs Competing Proton Transfer Reactions: Addressing Key Parameters of Ion Chemistry in Ion Mobility Spectrometry.

Christoph Schaefer, Stefan Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christoph SchaeferLeibniz University Hannover, Institute of Electrical Engineering and Measurement Technology, Department of Sensors and Measurement Technology, Appelstr. 9A, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0687-078X
Stefan ZimmermannLeibniz University Hannover, Institute of Electrical Engineering and Measurement Technology, Department of Sensors and Measurement Technology, Appelstr. 9A, 30167 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-6657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ion mobility spectrometers (IMS) are widely used in various gas sensing applications due to their high sensitivity and rapid analysis times. However, in complex gas mixtures, reactions between the protonated target analyte and interfering species can lead to discrimination of analytes with low gas basicity, reducing sensitivity or even making detection impossible. Operating IMS at low pressure and high reduced electric field strengths has been shown to mitigate these competing ion-molecule reactions. Therefore, in this work, we present a kinetic model to evaluate the effect of key operating parameters on the ion suppression caused by competing ion-molecule reactions, guiding the instrumental design of IMS. The results demonstrate that measures to reduce competing ion-molecule reactions, such as lowering the operating pressure or reaction time, also reduce sensitivity due to fewer ion-neutral collisions. However, in scenarios with high concentrations of interferents, the reduced effect of competing ion-molecule reactions is critical for detecting target analytes with low gas basicity, thereby enhancing sensitivity under such conditions. Based on these findings, decreasing operating pressure and reaction time or increasing reduced electric field strength are the most promising strategies to minimize competing reactions and, in complex chemical backgrounds, increase sensitivity.

Identifiers

PMID40747918
PMCPMC12412161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.