ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Time-related Bias When Studying Perinatal Complications After Maternal Injuries: Application to Maternal Injuries and Preterm Birth.
Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSome studies examining associations between maternal injuries and preterm birth reported null or counterintuitive protective effects, especially for 3rd-trimester injuries, likely due to time-related biases.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study comprised all births occurring at the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist health system between 2018 and 2024. We ascertained maternal injuries using validated diagnostic codes and defined preterm birth as gestational age at delivery <37 weeks. We estimated associations between maternal injuries and preterm birth with two approaches. We used logistic regression for time-fixed analysis (injury at any point in pregnancy yes/no and preterm birth yes/no) and Cox proportional hazards models for time-varying analysis (i.e., time-varying injury definition, restricted follow-up to periods when pregnancies were at risk of preterm birth).
resultsAmong 58,897 births, 1,801 women (3.1%) experienced maternal injuries during pregnancy. With the time-varying approach, maternal injuries were associated with increased risk of preterm birth (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.32). Trimester-specific analyses showed positive associations for all trimesters, with higher effect estimates observed for 2nd and 3rd trimester injuries (adjusted HRs: 1.17; 95% CI = 0.97, 1.42) and 1.22 (95% CI = 0.92, 1.61), respectively. With time-fixed analyses, associations for any injury were underestimated, compared with time-varying analyses, and results for 3rd trimester injuries showed counterintuitive negative associations (adjusted odds ratio: 0.73 [0.54, 0.98]).
conclusionsTime-related biases typically underestimate associations between maternal injuries and preterm birth, particularly for 3rd - trimester injuries. Rigorous study design and analytical methods that account for time-related biases are crucial in studies investigating adverse outcomes after maternal injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.