Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747858›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025

Comparison of Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Livestock Breeds Based On Post-Thaw Spermatological Parameters.

Doğukan Özen, Hülya Özen, Elif Bersu Gül, Kemal Tuna Olgaç, Koray Tekin, Mehmet Borga Tirpan, Ergun Akçay, Ali Daşkin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Doğukan ÖzenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1943-2690
Hülya ÖzenGulhane Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Informatics, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkiye.
Elif Bersu GülDepartment of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Kemal Tuna OlgaçFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9216-7059
Koray TekinFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3862-2337
Mehmet Borga TirpanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8782-1108
Ergun AkçayFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Ali DaşkinFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive efficiency is a crucial determinant of livestock productivity, with sperm quality being a key factor in successful fertilization. The quantitative assessment of spermatozoa using computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) yields valuable kinetic variables that can vary across cattle breeds. This study aimed (i) to classify post-thawed semen samples from Holstein, Simmental and Charolais bulls based on eight CASA-derived variables, progressive motility (PM), non-PM, velocity curve linear (VCL), velocity straight line (VSL), beat-cross frequency (BCF), amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH), hyperactivity and velocity average path (VAP); (ii) to benchmark three tree-based classifiers, C5.0, random forest (RF) and stochastic gradient boosting (SGB), for their ability to assign ejaculates to the correct breed; and (iii) to identify the most informative predictors for breed discrimination within the algorithms. We applied and compared the predictive performance of three tree-based classification algorithms: C5.0, RF and SGB after the original dataset was randomly divided into the training and testing sets with 70%-30%, 75%-25% and 80%-20% ratios, respectively. Parameter tuning was carried out with the application of a 10-fold cross-validation technique with ten times repetition. The results showed that SGB achieved the highest performance for classification, with a mean balanced accuracy of 85.7% (86.4% for Holstein, 84.3% for Simmental and 86.5% for Charolais), followed by RF (83.5%) and C5.0 (73.5%). PM, hyperactivity and VSL were the most informative predictors. The results offer insights into breed-specific sperm characteristics, with potential implications for the development of breed-specific calibrations for CASA and ensure more efficient resource allocation in livestock production.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSemen AnalysisSemen PreservationSpermatozoaAlgorithmsAnimalsBreedingCattleCryopreservationMalebreed predictionclassificationcomputer‐assisted sperm analysis (CASA)machine learningspermatological parameters

Identifiers

PMID40747858
PMCPMC12314791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.