ArticleJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous and Transdermal Flunixin Meglumine in Wool and Hair Sheep (Ovis aries).
Article in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of flunixin meglumine of intravenous (IV) and transdermal (TD) flunixin meglumine administration on different coat types (wool vs. hair) in 12 healthy sheep. Polled dorset (wool) sheep (n = 6) and katahdin (hair) sheep (n = 6) received 2.2 mg/kg IV and 3.3 mg/kg TD with a 10-day washout period between treatments. Plasma samples were obtained for 96 h following both IV and TD administration, respectively. Flunixin concentrations were quantified by use of high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry, and PK parameters were derived using different modeling techniques. A population non-linear mixed effect model showed that coat type has a significant effect on the absorption rate following TD administration. The mean bioavailability of TD flunixin was not significantly different (48.76% ± 17.49% and 36.61% ± 4.33%; p = 0.093) in wool and hair sheep, respectively. Maximum plasma concentrations following TD administration were higher in wool sheep (1.57 μg/mL; range, 0.6-3.41 μg/mL) compared to hair sheep (0.57 μg/mL; range, 0.36-0.83 μg/mL). The PK results provide further support for clinical studies to examine the efficacy of TD flunixin in different breeds of sheep.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.