ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Automatic detection of lucky bamboo nodes based on Improved YOLOv7.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Assisted surgical vision: evaluating YOLOv8 and YOLOv12 for real-time detection in colon cancer surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The detection of lucky bamboo ( Methods: This study proposes an improved YOLOv7-based model for real-time, precise bamboo node detection. The model integrates a Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) attention mechanism into the feature extraction network to enhance target localization and introduces a Weighted Intersection over Union (WIoU) loss function to optimize bounding box regression. A dataset of 2,000 annotated images (augmented from 1,000 originals) was constructed, covering diverse environmental conditions (e.g., blurred backgrounds, occlusions). Training was conducted on a server with an RTX 4090 GPU using PyTorch. Results: The proposed model achieved a 97.6% mAP@0.5, significantly outperforming the original YOLOv7 (83.4% mAP) by 14.2%, while maintaining the same inference speed (100.18 FPS). Compared to state-of-the-art alternatives, our model demonstrated superior efficiency. It showed 41.5% and 153% higher FPS than YOLOv11 (70.8 FPS) and YOLOv12 (39.54 FPS), respectively. Despite marginally lower mAP (≤1.3%) versus these models, the balanced trade-off between accuracy and speed makes it more suitable for industrial deployment. Robustness tests under challenging conditions (e.g., low light, occlusions) further validated its reliability, with consistent confidence scores across scenarios. Discussion: The proposed method significantly improves detection accuracy and efficiency, offering a viable tool for industrial applications in smart agriculture and handicraft production. Future work will address limitations in detecting nodes obscured by mottled patterns or severe occlusions by expanding label categories during training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.