Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747519›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Pedro M P Correia, Xinyi Dong, Mengming Chen, Anton Frisgaard Nørrevang, Guangbin Luo, Michael Palmgren

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pedro M P CorreiaNovoCrops Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Xinyi DongNovoCrops Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Mengming ChenNovoCrops Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Anton Frisgaard NørrevangNovoCrops Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Guangbin LuoNovoCrops Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Michael PalmgrenNovoCrops Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestication of grasses has historically favored annual species due to their rapid growth and suitability for crop rotation; however, such crops rely heavily on human input. In contrast, perennial grasses, which live for multiple years, offer significant environmental benefits, such as improved soil health and natural resilience to biotic and abiotic stress, but have not yet been domesticated. Gene editing of yield-related genes presents an opportunity to improve yield stability in perennial cereal crops. However, this process typically requires transformation to introduce gene-editing tools, and many perennial grasses are recalcitrant to traditional

Indexed as

grain cropsIn planta transformationmonocotsperennial agriculturerecalcitrance

Identifiers

PMID40747519
PMCPMC12310747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.