Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

The power of combined modalities in interactive robot learning.

Helen Beierling, Robin Beierling, Anna-Lisa Vollmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helen BeierlingInteractive Robotics in Medicine and Care, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Robin BeierlingInteractive Robotics in Medicine and Care, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Anna-Lisa VollmerInteractive Robotics in Medicine and Care, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the continuous advancement of Artificial intelligence (AI), robots as embodied intelligent systems are increasingly becoming more present in daily life like households or in elderly care. As a result, lay users are required to interact with these systems more frequently and teach them to meet individual needs. Human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning (HIL-RL) offers an effective way to realize this teaching. Studies show that various feedback modalities, such as preference, guidance, or demonstration can significantly enhance learning success, though their suitability varies among users expertise in robotics. Research also indicates that users apply different scaffolding strategies when teaching a robot, such as motivating it to explore actions that promise success. Thus, providing a collection of different feedback modalities allows users to choose the method that best suits their teaching strategy, and allows the system to individually support the user based on their interaction behavior. However, most state-of-the-art approaches provide users with only one feedback modality at a time. Investigating combined feedback modalities in interactive robot learning remains an open challenge. To address this, we conducted a study that combined common feedback modalities. Our research questions focused on whether these combinations improve learning outcomes, reveal user preferences, show differences in perceived effectiveness, and identify which modalities influence learning the most. The results show that combining the feedback modalities improves learning, with users perceiving the effectiveness of the modalities vary ways, and certain modalities directly impacting learning success. The study demonstrates that combining feedback modalities can support learning even in a simplified setting and suggests the potential for broader applicability, especially in robot learning scenarios with a focus on user interaction. Thus, this paper aims to motivate the use of combined feedback modalities in interactive imitation learning.

Indexed as

human-in-the-loop learninghuman-robot interactioninteractive robot learninglearning from demonstrationmulti-modal feedbackpreference-based learningreinforcement learningscaffolding in robot learning

Identifiers

PMID40747445
PMCPMC12312635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.