Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747439›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Evaluating remote photoplethysmography: A 10-minute video dataset in uncontrolled lighting.

Gonçalo Rodrigues, Nuno M Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gonçalo RodriguesFaculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon (FCUL), Campo Grande 016, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
Nuno M GarciaFaculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon (FCUL), Campo Grande 016, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) is a technique that enables the extraction of physiological parameters, such as heart rate, from video recordings in a completely non-contact manner. Although widely studied, rPPG research has been hindered by the scarcity of long-duration and complex video datasets recorded in realistic, everyday scenarios. In this work, we present a dataset comprising 10-minute facial video recordings of 26 participants, along with recorded electrocardiograms (ECG) used as a reference signal. The recordings were acquired using a low-cost RGB webcam and a research-grade ECG monitor, under natural daylight and uncontrolled ambient lighting conditions. Videos were manually synchronized with the ECG and cropped to a 64 × 64 pixel resolution to ensure subject anonymization. While participants were predominantly young Portuguese university students, and Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV are represented, this limits generalizability to broader populations. Each recording includes auxiliary metadata such as temperature, humidity, and illumination levels measured at the beginning and end of the session. The dataset aims to support the development and benchmarking of rPPG algorithms under realistic webcam conditions. Baseline heart rate estimations using standard rPPG methods are also provided.

Indexed as

Long-Duration Facial VideoNatural Lighting ConditionsRemote Heart Rate EstimationRemote Photoplethysmography (rPPG)

Identifiers

PMID40747439
PMCPMC12311941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.