Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747412›Full record

ArticleMissouri medicine

Lower Extremity Orthotic Device Prescriptions: Basics of Evaluation and Management.

Benjamin Boyett, Paul S Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Measuring satisfaction with orthotic and prosthetic devices.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin BoyettProfessor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Paul S JonesFourth-year Chief Resident in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides a basic overview for the role of some lower extremity orthotic devices in the rehabilitation and support of the maximization of function for individuals with neuromusculoskeletal conditions. It provides a comprehensive overview of orthotic principles, designs, indications, and limitations, emphasizing the importance of thorough patient assessment in device prescription. Key terminology, including definitions of orthoses and the role of certified orthotists, is clarified. The paper discusses various types of orthotic devices, comparing custom-made to off-the-shelf options, and examines the materials used, such as leather, metal alloys, and thermoplastics, each with distinct characteristics. Additionally, this article highlights functional considerations, fitting protocols, and the need for ongoing follow-up care to prevent complications like pressure injuries. The conclusion underscores the necessity of individualized orthotic prescriptions, addressing specific patient needs to optimize rehabilitation outcomes and enhance mobility while acknowledging the trade-offs in energy expenditure and gait velocity associated with orthotic use.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityOrthotic DevicesPrescriptionsEquipment DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID40747412
PMCPMC12309832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.