ArticleMissouri medicine
Lower Extremity Orthotic Device Prescriptions: Basics of Evaluation and Management.
Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring satisfaction with orthotic and prosthetic devices.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides a basic overview for the role of some lower extremity orthotic devices in the rehabilitation and support of the maximization of function for individuals with neuromusculoskeletal conditions. It provides a comprehensive overview of orthotic principles, designs, indications, and limitations, emphasizing the importance of thorough patient assessment in device prescription. Key terminology, including definitions of orthoses and the role of certified orthotists, is clarified. The paper discusses various types of orthotic devices, comparing custom-made to off-the-shelf options, and examines the materials used, such as leather, metal alloys, and thermoplastics, each with distinct characteristics. Additionally, this article highlights functional considerations, fitting protocols, and the need for ongoing follow-up care to prevent complications like pressure injuries. The conclusion underscores the necessity of individualized orthotic prescriptions, addressing specific patient needs to optimize rehabilitation outcomes and enhance mobility while acknowledging the trade-offs in energy expenditure and gait velocity associated with orthotic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40747412PMC12309832What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.