Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747377›Full record

ReviewOncology letters2025

Histomorphological and molecular characteristics of liposarcoma (Review).

Ery Kus Dwianingsih, Rheza Gandi Bawono, Ade Saputri, Rusdy Ghazali Malueka, Yuni Artha Prabowo Putro, Sumadi Lukman Anwar, Irianiwati Widodo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Liposarcoma: State of the Art-A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. [A case report of recurrent giant intermuscular lipoma in the temporal region].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ery Kus DwianingsihDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Dr Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Rheza Gandi BawonoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Dr Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Ade SaputriDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Dr Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Rusdy Ghazali MaluekaDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Dr Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Yuni Artha Prabowo PutroOrthopedic Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Dr Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Sumadi Lukman AnwarSurgical Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Dr Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Irianiwati WidodoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Gadjah Mada University, Dr Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liposarcomas represent the most prevalent subtype of soft-tissue sarcomas, comprising 15-20% of all documented cases. However, sarcomas demonstrate notable clinical and pathological variability, which complicates the processes of diagnosis and treatment. Histomorphological analysis can produce inconsistent results due to inter-examiner variability, which highlights the need for more reliable biomarkers. Genetic and epigenetic alterations may delineate the biological behavior of liposarcomas and assist in the prediction of liposarcoma prognosis. The present review highlights the related genomic alterations in sarcoma and their associations with relevant histomorphology, predilection, targeted therapy and prognosis. Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas exhibit amplified genes, MDM2 proto-oncogene and cyclin-dependent kinase 4, which are potential targets for therapy. Myxoid liposarcoma, characterized by the chromosomal translocations t(12;16) with fused in liposarcoma-DNA damage-inducible transcript 3 protein (DDIT3) fusion and t(12;22) with Ewing sarcoma RNA-binding protein 1-DDIT3 fusion, demonstrate a favorable response to treatment; however, myxoid liposarcoma displays elevated recurrence rates. Moreover, the complex karyotype and lack of specificity in pleomorphic liposarcoma are associated with poor treatment outcomes and increased recurrence rates. Integration of morphological features with molecular biomarkers may potentially enhance diagnosis, facilitate targeted therapies and improve sarcoma prognosis in the future.

Indexed as

biomarkerdiagnostic precisionmolecular markersarcomatargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID40747377
PMCPMC12311419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.