Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747366›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Intimate partner violence during pregnancy against 601,534 women aged 15 to 49 years in 57 LMICs: prevalence, disparities, trends and associated factors using Demographic and Health Survey data.

David Jean Simon, Vénunyé Claude Kondo Tokpovi, Adama Ouedraogo, Kassoum Dianou, Ann Kiragu, Comfort Z Olorunsaiye, Bénédique Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David Jean SimonCentre de Recherches Appliquées et Interdisciplinaires sur les Violences Intimes, Familiales et Structurelles (RAIV), Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Vénunyé Claude Kondo TokpoviGroupe de Recherche sur l'inadaptation Psychosociale (GRIP), Laval University, Canada.
Adama OuedraogoLaboratoire Printemps, University of Versailles - Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Guyancourt, France.
Kassoum DianouUniversity of Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
Ann KiraguDepartment of Law and Political and Social Sciences, University of Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France.
Comfort Z OlorunsaiyeDepartment of Public Health, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA.
Bénédique PaulAgroUniQ Lab, Université Quisqueya, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women are at increased risk of intimate partner violence (IPV), with harmful outcomes for both mother and unborn baby. As this public health issue remained poorly documented in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), this comprehensive study aimed to investigate prevalence and disparities of intimate partner violence during pregnancy (IPVDP) in 57 LMICs, grouped into WHO Regions and World Bank 2022 Income Classification. We also examined changes in IPVDP in LMICs and associated factors. Methods: Data for this study were extracted from Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 57 LMICs from 2000 to 2024. Countries without domestic violence data were excluded from the study. We estimated overall, regional, sub-regional, and national-weighted prevalence of IPVDP among women aged 15-49 years. Trends in IPVDP were calculated at the national level using the average annual rate of change (AARC) in a subset of 31 countries with at least two survey rounds. A Poisson regression model was fitted for identifying factors associated with IPVDP. Findings: The study included a total weighted sample of 601,534 women. The pooled prevalence of IPVDP was 6.3% (95% CI 6.2-6.4). The Eastern Mediterranean region recorded the highest prevalence of IPVDP (11.3% [95% CI 10.8-11.9]), while the South-East Asia region (3.3% [95% CI 3.0-3.5]) the lowest. Similarly, low-income countries (LICs) reported the highest prevalence of IPVDP (8.2% [95% CI 7.9-8.4]). Further, prevalence varied greatly across countries, ranging from 1.1% (95% CI 0.6-1.5) in South Africa to 17.6% (95% CI 15.3-20.0) in Papua New Guinea. Examining AARC, most countries (23/31) experienced a decreasing trend in IPVDP, however, seven countries showed increasing trends, with the largest of 8.3% (95% CI 6.8-9.9) in Gambia and the smallest of 0.6% (95% CI -0.7 to 1.8) in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Similarly, we found that women: aged 15-19 years, from poor households, with primary education and below, who had more than 5 children, married before 18, who had not participated in household decision-making, and whose partners exhibited controlling behaviour had higher likelihood of experiencing IPVDP. Interpretation: Despite the implementation of numerous development programs aimed at reducing violence against women in LMICs in recent decades, IPVDP remains high in some countries and has even increased in others. Our findings indicate that efforts to reduce IPVDP and the associated health burdens need to be improved in many LMICs. In alignment with the 5.2 Sustainable Development Goal target (i.e., eliminate all forms of violence against women and girls), stakeholders such as NGOs and policymakers can use these findings to roll out interventions based on observed geographic and socio-demographic inequities to end IPVDP among vulnerable groups. Funding: The Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (2022-2023-BF15-314279).

Indexed as

DisparitiesIntimate partner violenceLow- and middle-income countriesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40747366
PMCPMC12312060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.