Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747327›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Dosimetric Clues to Addressing Urinary Toxicity Following Stereotactic Prostate Radiation Therapy.

Michael Cardoso, Matthew Richardson, Phillip Chlap, Sarah Keats, Alan Glyde, Sankar Arumugam, David Pryor, Joseph Bucci, Jarad Martin, Mark Sidhom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael CardosoLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.
Matthew RichardsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, Australia.
Phillip ChlapLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.
Sarah KeatsLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.
Alan GlydePrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Sankar ArumugamLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.
David PryorPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Joseph BucciSt George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Jarad MartinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, Australia.
Mark SidhomLiverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Delayed genitourinary (GU) toxicity is reported following definitive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer in 15% to 30% of patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is a relationship between radiation dose to the bladder and urethra and GU toxicity grade ≥ 2 (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0) in patients treated with SBRT. Methods and Materials: PROstate Multicenter External beam radioTHErapy Using Stereotactic boost was a phase 2 multicenter trial exploring an SBRT boost of 19 to 20 Gy in 2 fractions to the prostate combined with fractionated external beam radiation therapy as a virtual high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for patients with prostate cancer. Several bladder and urethral constraints were mandated prospectively. Bladder and the urethral planning organ at risk volume (PRV) dosimetry was correlated with physician-reported GU toxicity for patients ≥ 6 months following SBRT. An association between prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and urinary toxicity was also examined. Univariant and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Of the 151 patients, 87 had complete dosimetric data, and these patients were included in this analysis. In this cohort, 19.5% experienced grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity more than 6 months after stereotactic radiation therapy. On univariate analysis, prostatic urethral length, urethral PRV volume, bladder D2 cc, D5 cc, D10 cc, D15 cc, and bladder V8 were predictive of GU toxicity (all Conclusions: Prostate SBRT delivered as a virtual high-dose-rate boost is well tolerated overall. However, delayed GU toxicity is experienced by a significant minority of patients. Additional bladder constraints including D10 cc < 17 Gy and D15 cc < 15 Gy may further reduce the risk of delayed GU toxicity. Prior TURP may be a plausible additional risk factor.

Identifiers

PMID40747327
PMCPMC12311520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.