Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747326›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide Surveys.

Patrick Doyle, Neha Vapiwala, Mutlay Sayan, Miranda Lam, Shalini Moningi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick DoyleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Neha VapiwalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mutlay SayanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Miranda LamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shalini MoningiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Gender diversity in academic radiation oncology (RO) has become a topic of interest in recent years, with studies showing that practicing female academic radiation oncologists (AROs) are outnumbered by male colleagues at a rate of approximately 3:1. Gender differences are also observed in subspecialties whose patient populations are overwhelmingly of a single gender, such as genitourinary (GU) and gynecologic (GYN) RO. We aimed to investigate whether challenges exist for academic RO physicians who primarily treat patients of another gender, and, if so, what barriers they face in practice. Methods and Materials: We conducted 2 national surveys of female GU academic RO physicians and male GYN academic RO physicians working at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited academic centers. Survey questions focused on career path, challenges faced, and barriers to practicing GU or GYN oncology. Results: A total of 13/42 (30.2%) GU survey recipients responded as treating GU oncology and 31/77 (40.3%) GYN survey recipients responded as treating GYN oncology. Of these respondents, 9 GU and 3 GYN physicians reported facing challenges as an academic RO faculty member because of their gender identity, and 5 GU and 4 GYN physicians reported that their subspecialty specifically presented challenges. Neither group commonly reported difficulties developing trust and rapport with patients. In the GU academic RO group, reports of challenging relationships with other professional colleagues were common. Difficulties finding or serving as a mentor were also common in both groups. Conclusions: Female GU AROs and male GYN AROs may face unique challenges. Identifying and understanding these challenges directly from practicing physicians are important steps in improving professional success, career satisfaction, and clinical care quality.

Identifiers

PMID40747326
PMCPMC12311497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.