ArticleBrain & spine2025
Robot-assisted three column trans-intervertebral osteotomy by combined navigated trajectories: A feasibility study and technical report.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal osteotomy is indicated for malalignment and deformity, but the degree of osseous resection is mainly determined by the surgeon's experience. Navigation and robotics are techniques for the precise placement of pedicle screws. Research question: Can an innovative combined navigated trajectory (CNT) design based on a spinal robot achieve precise 3-column osteotomy. Materials and methods: The Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) robotic system was used to design and execute type II trans-intervertebral osteotomy (TIO) via CNT. Preoperative CT images of a synthetic spine model and a cadaveric specimen were processed to create multitrajectory plans aligned in the sagittal plane, traversing the pedicle bases. The intraoperative workflow included a robotic setup, bone mount bridge fixation, pre- and postresection registration, and robotic trajectory drilling followed by osteotomy completion via a bone chisel. Results: After posterior element resection, the osteotomy vertebrae were successfully registered in both the synthetic and cadaveric models. Multitrajectory drilling followed by chisel combination achieved complete TIO. Quantitative analysis revealed that the deviation of the posterior vertebral wall from the preoperative plan was less than 2 mm in both specimens, with corresponding length and angle differences of -4.00 %/-1.55° (synthetic) and -6.95 %/-2.59° (cadaveric). Discussion and conclusion: Combined navigated trajectory spinal resection is a possible technique for quantitative spinal osteotomy using MXSE. Biomechanical and clinical studies are needed to further evaluate the suitability and safety of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.