ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025
When occupational therapists and physiotherapists are leading-same or different? A qualitative study of management practice.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the Danish public healthcare sector, leading occupational therapists (LOTs) and physiotherapists (LPTs) hold key managerial roles. However, fewer LOTs engage in management development activities compared to LPTs, despite both needing similar tools for effective management. This study explores (1) the leadership styles of LOTs and LPTs, (2) their expectations from management practices, and (3) any discrepancies in their leadership roles. Method: A phenomenological-hermeneutic design was used, with in-depth interviews conducted with eight LOTs and eight LPTs. A comparative analysis identified differences in their leadership practices. The interview guide was based on Danish management studies and theories of motivation and leadership identity. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Both LOTs and LPTs, with 10 years of managerial experience, are motivated by personnel management and value a modern leadership style. LOTs appear to have a stronger professional identity as occupational therapists. Minor differences were observed, with LOTs being more reserved in decision-making and seeking internal support, while LPTs were more direct and sought external guidance. Conclusion: The study found slight discrepancies between LOTs and LPTs regarding management identity, decision-making, and support needs. LPTs may benefit from strategic management support, while LOTs could strengthen their managerial identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.