ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025
Sleep health and occupational balance in university students in Singapore.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adequate sleep is crucial for health and cognitive performance, yet university students often experience inadequate sleep. In Singapore, academic pressures and long work hours exacerbate sleep issues. This study explores sleep health among university students, focusing on cultural, behavioural and environmental factors, and its impact on occupational balance. Method: A mixed-methods study using a convergent parallel design was conducted at a Singapore university. Students from Health and Social Sciences and Engineering faculties participated in an anonymous survey on sleep quality and severity of symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress. Separate focus groups were conducted to understand students' sleep experiences. Results: A total of 147 students completed the survey; 36 joined focus groups. Key findings include (1) Sleep Quality and Daytime Functioning - 79% of participants reported difficulties maintaining enthusiasm, and 52.4% experienced daytime sleepiness at least once in the past month, impacting academic performance and social balance. (2) Sleep and Health - poor overall sleep quality was significantly correlated with emotional distress. (3) Sleep and Social Availability - Social commitments often dictated sleep times, affecting overall sleep quality. Conclusion: Addressing sleep challenges can enhance academic performance and overall well-being among university students. Interventions addressing sleep quality should consider cultural and societal influences on occupational balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.