ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Interpretable machine learning-based prediction of mortality in critical cancer patients with delirium: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Merging artificial intelligence into cancer nursing care: Current applications, challenges, and opportunities.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- An interpretable nomogram for predicting early acute postoperative hypocalcemia in differentiated thyroid cancer: development and internal validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Delirium in cancer patients presents a significant clinical challenge, often leading to increased mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. This study aimed to develop an interpretable and generalizable machine learning (ML) model for early prediction of mortality risk in cancer patients with delirium. Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was employed, utilizing data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Five ML models were subsequently constructed and evaluated. Results: A total of 1893 cancer patients with delirium were included in the analysis, of whom 685 (36.2%) died within 28 days who were admitted to the intensive care unit at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2008 and 2022. The Category Boosting (CatBoost) algorithm outperformed other ML models, achieving the highest area under the curve (AUC) on both training and validation datasets. Its robustness was supported by a bias-corrected performance curve closely aligned with the ideal line and the greatest net benefit in decision curve analysis across all threshold probabilities (0-1). The top five predictors of 28-day mortality were high Glasgow Coma Scale and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, use of antibiotics, propofol, and vasopressors. Conclusions: This study developed an optimal and explainable ML model for predicting 28-day mortality in cancer patients with delirium. The CatBoost algorithm demonstrated stable and robust performance, and interpretability analysis highlighted key predictors. These findings may aid early clinical decision-making and targeted interventions for this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.