ArticleCureus2025
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Toothache Prevalence and Its Contributing Factors in Dental Outpatients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of toothaches in patients attending the outpatient department (OPD) of a dental institution in India. The primary objective was to identify the clinical and behavioral factors associated with toothaches to support the development of targeted preventive and treatment strategies for this population. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted over six months in the OPD of a dental college. Using consecutive sampling, 6732 patients were evaluated. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and clinical examinations conducted by trained dental professionals. Information on demographic characteristics, oral hygiene habits, lifestyle behaviors (smoking, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use), and socioeconomic status was gathered. Clinical indicators including dental caries and periodontal status were also assessed. Bivariate analysis (chi-square test) and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the associations between toothaches and potential risk factors. Point-biserial correlation was used to evaluate etiological factors. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated.
resultsToothaches were reported in 3883 patients (58%). The prevalence of toothaches was significantly influenced by age, with patients aged 17-60 years showing higher odds (OR = 1.52, p = 0.023) than those under 17 years. Female patients were more than male patients (p < 0.001). Non-smokers (OR = 2.36, p = 0.021), non-tobacco users (OR = 1.98, p = 0.012), and non-alcohol users (OR = 2.12, p = 0.013) had higher odds of toothaches, indicating potential reverse causality. Poor oral hygiene practices, such as infrequent brushing (OR = 1.05, p = 0.001) and lack of dental floss use (OR = 1.96, p = 0.001), were associated with toothache. Urban residence (OR = 1.5, p = 0.001), higher education level, and low income emerged as significant predictors. Etiological analysis showed that self-medication had the strongest correlation with various causes of toothaches, including caries, trauma, and periodontitis.
conclusionThe prevalence of toothaches was reported to be 58%. The findings highlight the multifactorial nature of toothache, with strong links to age, sex, oral hygiene habits, lifestyle behaviors, and socioeconomic status. Comprehensive public health strategies focusing on education, early intervention, and behavioral modification are essential for reducing the burden of toothaches in the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.