ReviewCureus2025
Molecular Aspects of Rare Coagulation Factor Deficiencies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare coagulation factor deficiencies are inherited disorders affecting factors I, II, V, VII, X, XI, XIII, and combined forms. They mainly present with bleeding symptoms of variable severity. These deficiencies show significant clinical heterogeneity, with no consistent correlation between factor levels and bleeding intensity. Prevalence is higher in populations with high consanguinity rates. Understanding relies on the study of genetic and molecular mechanisms. Diagnosis is based on hemostasis testing, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and factor activity assays. In case of abnormalities, Molecular analysis is undertaken using genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood samples. Depending on the clinical context and the level of detail required, sequencing is performed using either Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, enabling the identification of pathogenic variants responsible for the coagulation disorder. Variant interpretation follows American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines. Large deletions or duplications are assessed via Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) or Copy number variations (CNV) analysis. Molecular analysis revealed a wide range of mutations depending on the deficient factor. Missense mutations are the most common, followed by nonsense, splicing, and insertion/deletion mutations. Some mutations prevent factor production, while others alter its structure or secretion. Each mutation type has a distinct impact on the bleeding phenotype. Genetic characterization improves diagnostic accuracy and guides clinical management. Modern molecular tools have enhanced the understanding of these disorders' pathophysiology. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for optimal patient care. Ongoing research is key to developing targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.