Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747190›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Social Media Policies in U.S. Medical Education: An Analysis of Content, Consistency, and Gaps.

Elisheva Knopf, Leah Leidy, Darian Peters, George R Luck, Mario Jacomino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisheva KnopfMedicine, Charles E Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, USA.
Leah LeidyMedicine, Charles E Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, USA.
Darian PetersMedicine, Charles E Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, USA.
George R LuckIntegrated Medical Science, Charles E Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, USA.
Mario JacominoWomen's and Children's Health, Charles E Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Given the increasing prevalence and integration of social media platforms into various aspects of life, it is essential for medical schools to establish clear guidelines for their educational application and appropriate personal use. This study aims to assess the policies developed by medical schools in the United States and its territories addressing the use of social media. Methods Between June and July 2024, investigators examined the websites of all medical schools in the United States and its territories to assess their social media policies. The search involved reviewing student handbooks, policy webpages, and related websites. Specific search terms included "social media policy," "social networking policy," "social media," "social network," "social," and "media." Descriptive statistics, chi-squared analysis, and Fisher's exact tests were utilized to describe and compare the categorical variables. Results Of the 199 U.S. medical schools, 166 (85%) had a social media policy (131 allopathic (M.D.) and 35 osteopathic (D.O.) schools). Among these policies, 98 (59%) were found in student handbooks, 45 (27%) on policy webpages, and 23 (14%) on other sites, typically related to technology and student affairs. Specifically, 131 (79%) policies were categorized as dedicated social media policies, while 35 (21%) were primarily included under student professionalism and technology policies. M.D. schools were more likely to have a social media policy than D.O. schools (p < 0.001). Schools in the South were also more likely to have social media policies (37% total policies, p < 0.001). Policy evaluation found that many policies mentioned platform names that are dated, such as Twitter instead of X, or failed to include the names of newer platforms, such as TikTok. Conclusions Most U.S. medical schools have social media policies; however, some need updates to reflect evolving platforms and current student use. Updating policies to address the evolving digital landscape will ensure that guidelines remain relevant and effective in promoting professionalism in medical education.

Indexed as

educationmedical schoolmedical studentpolicysocial mediatechnology

Identifiers

PMID40747190
PMCPMC12313334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.