ArticleCureus2025
Transabdominal Ultrasound Measured Rectal Diameter for Identifying Fecal Impaction in Children With Functional Constipation: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Functional constipation (FC) is a common pediatric disorder, with fecal impaction posing significant diagnostic challenges. Digital rectal examination (DRE), to identify fecal mass in the rectum, is invasive and often distressing. Transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) offers a promising, non-invasive alternative by measuring transverse rectal diameter (RD). This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-measured RD in detecting fecal impaction among children with FC, using DRE as the reference standard. Methods In this diagnostic accuracy study conducted over 18 months, 80 children aged six months to 18 years with FC were recruited and divided into impaction (n=40) and non-impaction (n=40) groups. All cases underwent clinical evaluation, DRE, and blinded TAUS assessment. Mean RD was compared between the two groups, and subgroup analysis was performed to compare mean RD across age groups and fecal impaction status. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine optimal RD cutoffs for diagnosing fecal impaction across two age groups (<4 years and >4 years). Results The mean transverse rectal diameter was significantly larger in the impaction group (mean = 3.38 cm, SD = 1.32) compared to the non-impaction group (mean = 2.15 cm, SD = 0.93), indicating a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.07, p < 0.001). The subgroup >4 years with fecal impaction had significantly larger RD (mean = 3.62, SD = 1.49) compared to the same age group without fecal impaction (mean = 2.1, SD = 1.16, p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed moderate accuracy for an RD cut-off of 2.5 cm in children <4 years (sensitivity 60%, specificity 68.75%, AUC = 0.616) and higher accuracy at a 3.5 cm cut-off for children >4 years (sensitivity 63.3%, specificity 95.8%, AUC = 0.803). Rectal wall thickness did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion Ultrasound-measured RD is a valuable, non-invasive diagnostic tool for identifying fecal impaction in pediatric functional constipation, particularly in children over four years, when using age-specific cut-off values. Larger multicentric studies are required to confirm and refine the cut-off values. Incorporating transabdominal ultrasound into routine practice may enhance patient comfort while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.