Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747134›Full record

ArticleEcosystems and people (Abingdon, England)2025

Visioning future treescapes in upland landscapes: using deliberative processes to understand values and land-use preferences of local stakeholders.

Alix Syder, Susan Baker, Euan Bowditch, Sheena Carlisle, Tom Finch, Melissa Minter, Natasha Constant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alix SyderCentre for Conservation Science, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Centre for Conservation Science, Sandy, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7842-5328
Susan BakerSchool of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-4157
Euan BowditchInstitute for Biodiversity and Freshwater Conservation, University of Highland and Islands, Inverness, Scotland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-8160
Sheena CarlisleSchool of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0894-6832
Tom FinchCentre for Conservation Science, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Centre for Conservation Science, Sandy, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-8513
Melissa MinterCentre for Conservation Science, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Centre for Conservation Science, Sandy, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-7176
Natasha ConstantCentre for Conservation Science, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Centre for Conservation Science, Sandy, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-6791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UK environmental policy places an increasing emphasis on large-scale land-use change, with tree-planting objectives set to contribute towards meeting legislated climate and environmental targets. Upland landscapes might expect to see disproportionate change because of the perception that opportunity costs (e.g. from foregone agricultural activities) are low. However, without considering the preferences of local stakeholders, delivery may be misaligned, underlying conflicts not considered and local actors alienated. Land-use preferences are shaped by the values stakeholders attribute to landscapes, and broader contextual factors, both biophysical (i.e. climate change) or institutional (i.e. land-use policy and financial instruments). This paper explores the relationship between values, contextual factors, and land-use preferences, by applying Participatory Scenario Planning (PSP) to design future land-use visions of local stakeholders in two upland landscapes in England (North Pennines and Dales) and Wales (Elenydd). The paper address two overarching research questions (1) How do different stakeholders value upland landscapes? and (2) How does context shape stakeholders' decisions regarding future land-use? Whilst our results show a greater potential for treescape expansion in the uplands than expected, underlying nuances of land-use preferences demonstrate challenges to treescape expansion here. Our approach also highlights the importance of taking into account contextual factors when examining land-use preferences, for example climate change as a positive driver for on-farm treescape measures, whereas regulatory context limit stakeholders' ambition for change. Only by understanding these complexities through deliberative processes can future treescape expansion at local scales achieve the best outcomes for people and nature.

Indexed as

Ecosystem servicesland-usenet zeroparticipatory scenario planningUKZuzana V. Harmackova

Identifiers

PMID40747134
PMCPMC12312000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.