Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40747133›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Enhancing Informed Consent Forms for Medical Devices: International Regulatory Guidance and Ethical Recommendations.

Olga Marius Peycheva, Lydia R Ainsworth, Galina Fujimori-Petrikova, Wai Theng Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olga Marius PeychevaSolutions OP Ltd, Dover, UK.
Lydia R AinsworthSolutions OP Ltd, Dover, UK.
Galina Fujimori-PetrikovaSolutions OP Ltd, Dover, UK.
Wai Theng LeeSolutions OP Ltd, Dover, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many developers of medical devices face a new reality with the increasing demand for clinical evidence that is generated by clinical investigations. This affects biotechnology companies, start-ups and academic research centres. The participants' informed consent form (ICF), which includes the participant information sheet (PIS), is among the critical documents that are part of the clinical investigation. While many countries around the world follow the principles of good clinical practice (GCP), there are country-specific variations of the ICF requirements. In addition, many of the country guidelines are focused on medicinal products rather than medical devices. Clinical investigations involving medical devices have their unique challenges and need additional guidance to help developers improve the ICF and PIS content. This review provides information on the latest regulatory recommendations from Europe, USA and Asia regarding the content of the ICF and offers practical advice from professionals experienced in preparing ICFs. It also includes some ethical considerations that must be taken into account.

Indexed as

GCPinformed consentmedical devices

Identifiers

PMID40747133
PMCPMC12311233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.