ArticleDiscover public health2025
Beliefs related to COVID-19 vaccine receipt in the Chicago area.
Article in Discover public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In Chicago, Illinois, USA, Black and Latinx populations experienced disproportionate rates of COVID-19 mortality compared to White populations. By February 2023, Black residents had the lowest levels of completing the primary vaccine series of any racial or ethnic group. The Chicagoland CEAL Program surveyed an urban minoritized population about COVID-19 beliefs and vaccination status. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this association and to determine if it could be explained by health care connectedness and discrimination. Methods: Responses were collected from December 2021 to February 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to examine differences by vaccination status. Logistic regression was used to determine associations between each of the eight COVID-19 beliefs and not completing the primary vaccine series. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, health care connectedness, and discrimination. Results: From 760 surveys analyzed, 76% had completed the primary vaccine series. Most participants were women (74%), identified as nH Black (61%), and did not complete higher education (70%). Individuals who agreed that the vaccine was developed too quickly (aOR: 1.55 (0.99-2.43, Conclusion: Building and sustaining trustworthiness should be at the center of messaging surrounding vaccine uptake for Black and Latinx residents in an urban setting. Messaging should consider the importance of religion on vaccine uptake and collaborate with trusted messengers to address negative sentiment towards health behavior recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.